Tổ đình Ba La Mật366 Nguyễn Sinh Cung, TP. Huế
← Tam tạng Pāli — bản tiếng AnhTrang 3/8

Tam tạng Pāli · Tam tạng Pāli — bản tiếng Anh · Luận tạng › Yamaka

10.2.1. Chapter on the Present (Paccupannavāra) (YA10.2.1)

Dịch giả
U Kumārābhivaṁsa
Thông tin
Mã SuttaCentral: YA10.2.1

2. Chapter on the Past (Atītavāra)

Positive (Anuloma) Person (Puggala)

Eye faculty had arisen to this person. Had ear faculty arisen to that person? Yes.

Or else, ear faculty had arisen to this person. Had eye faculty arisen to that person? Yes.

Eye faculty had arisen to this person. Had nose faculty arisen to that person? Yes.

Or else, nose faculty had arisen to this person. Had eye faculty arisen to that person? Yes.

Eye faculty had arisen to this person. Had femininity faculty … pe … masculinity faculty arisen to that person Yes.

Or else, masculinity faculty had arisen to this person. Had eye faculty arisen to that person? Yes.

Eye faculty had arisen to this person. Had life faculty arisen to that person? Yes.

Or else, life faculty had arisen to this person. Had eye faculty arisen to that person? Yes.

Eye faculty had arisen to this person. Had (mental) joy faculty arisen to that person? Yes.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty had arisen to this person. Had eye faculty arisen to that person? Yes.

Eye faculty had arisen to this person. Had equanimity faculty arisen to that person? Yes.

Or else, equanimity faculty had arisen to this person. Had eye faculty arisen to that person? Yes.

Eye faculty had arisen to this person. Had faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty arisen to that person? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty had arisen to this person. Had eye faculty arisen to that person? Yes.

(Based on eye faculty.)

Nose faculty … pe … femininity faculty … pe … masculinity faculty … pe … life faculty … pe … (mental) joy faculty … pe … equanimity faculty … pe … faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty had arisen to this person. Had mind faculty arisen to that person? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty, had arisen to this person. Had understanding faculty arisen to that person? Yes.

Positive (Anuloma) Plane (Okāsa)

Eye faculty had arisen at this plane. Had ear faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, ear faculty had arisen at this plane. Had eye faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Eye faculty had arisen at this plane. Had nose faculty arisen at that plane? At the fine-material plane, eye faculty had arisen at that plane; nose faculty had not arisen at that plane. At the sensuous plane, eye faculty had arisen and nose faculty also had arisen.

Or else, nose faculty had arisen at this plane. Had eye faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Eye faculty had arisen at this plane. Had femininity faculty … pe … masculinity faculty arisen at that plane? At the fine-material plane, eye faculty had arisen; masculinity faculty had not arisen at that plane. At the sensuous plane, eye faculty had arisen and masculinity faculty also had arisen.

Or else, masculinity faculty had arisen at this plane. Had eye faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Eye faculty had arisen at this plane. Had life faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, life faculty had arisen at this plane. Had eye faculty arisen at that plane? At that plane of non-percipient beings and at the immaterial plane, life faculty had arisen at the immaterial plane, life faculty had arisen; eye faculty had not arisen at that plane. At the five-aggregate plane, life faculty had arisen and eye faculty also had arisen.

Eye faculty had arisen at this plane. Had (mental) joy faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty had arisen at this plane. Had eye faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Eye faculty had arisen at this plane. Had equanimity faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, equanimity faculty had arisen at this plane. Had eye faculty arisen at that plane? At the immaterial plane, equanimity faculty had arisen eye faculty had not arisen at that plane. At the five-aggregate plane, equanimity faculty had arisen and eye faculty also had arisen.

Eye faculty had arisen at this plane. Had faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty had arisen at this plane. Had eye faculty arisen at that plane? At the immaterial plane, mind faculty had arisen; eye faculty had not arisen at that plane. At the five-aggregate plane, mind faculty had arisen and eye faculty also had arisen.

(Based on eye faculty.)

Nose faculty had arisen at this plane. Had femininity faculty … pe … masculinity faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, masculinity faculty had arisen this plane. Had nose faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Nose faculty had arisen at this plane. Had life faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, life faculty had arisen at this plane. Had nose faculty arisen at that plane? At the fine-material plane and at the immaterial plane, life faculty had arisen; nose faculty had not arisen at that plane. At the sensuous plane, life faculty had arisen and nose faculty also had arisen.

Nose faculty had arisen at this plane. Had (mental) joy faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty had arisen at this plane. Had nose faculty arisen at that plane? At the fine-material plane, (mental) joy faculty had arisen; nose faculty had not arisen at that plane. At the sensuous plane, (mental) joy faculty had arisen and nose faculty also had arisen.

Nose faculty had arisen at this plane. Had equanimity faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, equanimity faculty had arisen at this plane. Had nose faculty arisen at that plane? At the fine-material plane and at the immaterial plane, equanimity faculty had arisen; nose faculty had not arisen at that plane. At the sensuous plane, equanimity faculty had arisen and nose faculty also had arisen.

Nose faculty had arisen at this plane. Had faith faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, faith faculty had arisen at this plane. Had nose faculty arisen at that plane? At the fine-material plane and at the immaterial plane, faith faculty had arisen; nose faculty had not arisen at that plane.

At the sensuous plane, faith faculty had arisen and nose faculty also had arisen.

Nose faculty had arisen at this plan. Had understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty had arisen at this plane. Had nose faculty arisen at that plane? At the fine-material plane and at the immaterial plane, mind faculty had arisen; nose faculty had not arisen at that plane.

At the sensuous plane, mind faculty had arisen and nose faculty also had arisen.

(Based on nose faculty.)

Femininity faculty had arisen at this plane. Had masculinity faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, masculinity faculty had arisen at this plane. Had femininity faculty arisen at that plane? Yes. … pe …

Masculinity faculty had arisen at this plane. Had life faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, life faculty had arisen at this plane. Had masculinity faculty arisen at that plane? At the fine-material plane and at the immaterial plane, life faculty had arisen; masculinity faculty had not arisen at that plane. At the sensuous plane, life faculty had arisen and masculinity faculty also had arisen.

Masculinity faculty had arisen at this plane. Had (mental) joy faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty had arisen at this plane. Had masculinity faculty arisen that plane? At the fine-material plane, (mental) joy faculty had arisen; masculinity faculty had not arisen at that plane. At the sensuous plane, (mental) joy faculty had arisen and masculinity faculty also had arisen.

Masculinity faculty had arisen at this plane. Had equanimity faculty … pe … faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty had arisen at this plane. Had masculinity faculty arisen at that plane? At the fine-material plane and at the immaterial plane, mind faculty had arisen; masculinity faculty had not arisen at that plane. At the sensuous plane mind faculty had arisen and masculinity faculty also had arisen.

(Based on masculinity faculty.)

Life faculty had arisen at this plane. Had (mental) joy faculty arisen at that plane? At that plane of non-percipient beings, life faculty had arisen; (mental) joy faculty had not arisen at that plane. At the four-aggregate and five-aggregate plane; life faculty had arisen and (mental) joy faculty also had arisen.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty had arisen at this plane. Had life faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Life faculty had arisen at this plane. Had equanimity faculty … pe … faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty arisen at that plane? At that plane of non-percipient beings, life faculty had arisen; mind faculty had not arisen at that plane. At the four- aggregate and five-aggregate plane, life faculty had arisen and mind faculty also had arisen.

Or else, mind faculty had arisen at this plane. Had life faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

(Based on faith life.)

(Mental) joy faculty had arisen at this plane. Had equanimity faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, equanimity faculty had arisen at this plane. Had (mental) joy faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

(Mental) joy faculty had arisen at this plane. Had faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty had arisen at this plane. Had (mental) joy faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

(Based on (mental) joy faculty.)

Equanimity faculty had arisen at this plane. Had faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty had arisen at this plane. Had equanimity faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

(Based on equanimity faculty.)

Faith faculty had arisen at this plane. Had understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty had arisen at this plane. Had faith faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

(Based on faith faculty.)

Understanding faculty had arisen at this plane. Had mind faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty had arisen at this plane. Had understanding faculty arisen at that plane? Yes.

(Based on equanimity faculty.)

Positive (Anuloma) Person and Plane (Puggalokāsa)

Eye faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had ear faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, ear faculty had arisen to this person at this person at this plane. Had eye faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Eye faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had nose faculty arisen to that person at that plane? To those fine-material beings, eye faculty had arisen at that plane; nose faculty had not arise to those persons at that plane. To those sensuous persons eye faculty had arisen and nose faculty also had arisen at that plane.

Or else, nose faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had eye faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Eye faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had femininity faculty … pe … masculinity arisen to that person at that plane? To those fine-material beings, eye faculty had arisen at that plane; masculinity faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those sensuous persons, eye faculty had arisen and nose faculty also had arisen at that plane.

Or else, nose faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had eye faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Eye faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had femininity faculty … pe … masculinity faculty arisen to that person at that plane? To those fine-material beings, eye faculty had arisen at that plane; masculinity faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those sensuous persons eye faculty had arisen and masculinity faculty also had arisen at that plane.

Or else, masculinity faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had eye faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Eye faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had life faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, life faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had eye faculty arisen to that person at that plane? To those non-percipient beings and to those immaterial beings, life faculty had arisen at that plane, eye faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those five-aggregate persons, life faculty had arisen and eye faculty also had arisen at that plane.

Eye faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had (mental) joy faculty had arisen to this person at this plane? Yes.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had eye faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Eye faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had equanimity faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, equanimity faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had eye faculty arisen to that person to that plane? To those immaterial beings, equanimity faculty had arisen at that plane; eye faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those five-aggregate persons, equanimity faculty had arisen and eye faculty also had arisen at that plane.

Eye faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty had arisen to this person at this person at this plane. Had eye faculty arisen to that person at that plane? To those immaterial beings, mind faculty had arisen at that plane; eye faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those five-aggregate persons, mind faculty had arisen and eye faculty also had arisen at that plane.

(Based on eye faculty.)

Nose faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had femininity faculty … pe … masculinity faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, masculinity faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had nose faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Nose faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had life faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, life faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had nose faculty arisen to that person at that plane? To those fine-material beings and the immaterial beings, life faculty had arisen at that plane. To those sensuous persons, life faculty had arisen and nose faculty also had arisen at that plane.

Nose faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had (mental) joy faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had nose faculty arisen to that person at that plane? To those fine-material beings (mental) joy faculty had arisen at that plane; nose faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those sensuous persons (mental) joy faculty had arisen and more nose faculty also had arisen at that plane.

Nose faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had equanimity faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, equanimity faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had nose faculty arisen to that person at that plane? To those fine-material and the immaterial beings, equanimity faculty had arisen at that plane; nose faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those sensuous persons, equanimity faculty had arisen and nose faculty also had arisen at that plane.

Nose faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had faith faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, faith faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had nose faculty arisen to that person at that plane? To those fine-material and the immaterial beings, faith faculty had arisen at that plane; nose faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those sensuous persons, faith faculty had arisen and nose faculty also had arisen at that plane.

Nose faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had nose faculty arisen to that person at that plane? To those fine-material and the immaterial beings, mind faculty had arisen at that plane; nose faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those sensuous persons, mind faculty had arisen and nose faculty also had arisen at that plane.

(Based on nose faculty.)

Femininity faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had masculinity faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, masculinity faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had femininity faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes. … pe …

Masculinity faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had life faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, life faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had masculinity faculty arisen to that person at that plane? To those fine-material and the immaterial beings, life faculty had arisen at that plane: masculinity faculty had not arisen to those person at that plane. To those sensuous persons, life faculty had arisen and masculinity faculty also had arisen at that plane.

Masculinity faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had (mental) joy faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had masculinity faculty arisen to that plane? To those fine-material beings (mental) joy faculty had arisen at that plane; masculinity faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those sensuous persons (mental) joy faculty had arisen and masculinity faculty also had arisen at that plane.

Masculinity faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had equanimity faculty … pe … faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had masculinity faculty arisen to that plane? To those fine-material and the immaterial beings, mind faculty had arisen at that plane; masculinity faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those sensuous persons, mind faculty had arisen and masculinity faculty also had arisen at that plane.

(Based on masculinity faculty.)

Life faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had (mental) joy faculty arisen to that person at that plane? To those pure-abode beings at the moment of second consciousness and to those non-percipient beings, life faculty had arisen at that plane; (mental) joy faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those others four-aggregate and five-aggregate persons, life faculty had arisen and (mental) joy faculty also had arisen at that plane.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had life faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Life faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had equanimity faculty arisen to that person at that plane? To those non-percipient beings, life faculty had arisen at that plane; equanimity faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those four-aggregate and five-aggregate persons, life faculty had arisen and equanimity faculty also had arisen at that plane.

Or else, equanimity faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had life faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Life faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty arisen to that person at that plane? To those non-percipient beings, life faculty had arisen at that plane; understanding faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those four-aggregate and five-aggregate persons, life faculty had arisen and understanding faculty also had arisen at that plane.

Or else, understanding faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had life faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Life faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had mind faculty arisen to that person at that plane? To those non-percipient beings, life faculty had arisen at that plane; mind faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those four-aggregate and five-aggregate persons, life faculty had arisen and mind faculty also had arisen at that plane.

Or else, mind faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had life faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

(Based on life faculty.)

(Mental) joy faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had equanimity faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, equanimity faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had (mental) joy faculty arisen to that person at that plane? To those pure-abode beings at the moment of second consciousness, equanimity faculty had arisen at that plane; (mental) joy faculty had plane. Had faith faculty arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

(Based on understanding faculty.)

Negative (Paccanīka) Person (Puggala)

Eye faculty had not arisen to this person. Had ear faculty not arisen to that person? None.

Or else, ear faculty had not arisen to this person. Had eye faculty not arisen to that person? None.

Eye faculty had not arisen to this person. Had nose faculty not arisen to that person? None.

Or else, nose faculty had not arisen to this person. Had eye faculty not arisen to this person? None.

Eye faculty had not arisen to this person. Had femininity faculty … pe … masculinity faculty not arisen to that person? None.

Or else, masculinity faculty had not arisen to this person. Had eye faculty not arisen to that person? None.

Eye faculty had not arisen to this person. Had life faculty not arisen to that person? None.

Or else, life faculty had not arisen to this person. Had eye faculty not arisen to that person? None.

Eye faculty had not arisen to this person. Had (mental) joy faculty not arisen to that person? None.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty had not arisen to this person. Had eye faculty not arisen to that person? None.

Eye faculty had not arise to this person. Had equanimity faculty not arisen to that person? None.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty had not arisen to this person. Had eye faculty not arisen to that person? None.

Eye faculty had not arisen to this person. Had faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty not arisen to that person? None.

Or else, mind faculty had not arisen to this person. Had eye faculty not arisen to that person? None.

(Based on eye faculty.)

Nose faculty had not arisen to this person. Had femininity faculty … pe … masculinity faculty … pe … life faculty … pe … (mental) joy faculty … pe … equanimity faculty … pe … faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty not arise to that person? None.

Or else, mind faculty had not arisen to this person. Had nose faculty not arisen to that person? None … pe …

Understanding faculty had not arisen to this person. Had mind faculty not arisen to that person? None.

Or else mind faculty had not arisen to this person. Had understanding faculty arisen to that person? None.

(Based on understanding faculty.)

Negative (Paccanīka) Plane (Okāsa)

Eye faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had ear faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, ear faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had eye faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

Eye faculty had not arisen at that plane? Had nose faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, nose faculty not arisen at this plane. Had eye faculty not arisen at that plane? At the fine-material plane, nose faculty had not arise at that plane. At that plane of non-percipient beings a nd at the immaterial plane, neither nose faculty nor eye faculty had arisen at that plane.

Eye faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had femininity faculty … pe … masculinity faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, masculinity faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had eye faculty not arisen at that plane? At the fine-material plane, masculinity faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that plane eye faculty had not arisen at that plane. At that plane of non-percipient beings and the immaterial plane, neither masculinity faculty nor eye faculty had arisen at that plane.

Eye faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had life faculty not arisen at that plane? Had arisen.

Or else, life faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had eye faculty not arisen at that plane? None.

Eye faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had (mental) joy faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had eye faculty not arisen at that plane. Yes.

Eye faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had equanimity faculty not arisen at that plane? At the immaterial plane, eye faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that equanimity faculty had not arisen at that plane. At that plane of non-percipient beings, neither eye faculty nor equanimity faculty had arisen at that plane.

Or else, equanimity faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had eye faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

Eye faculty had arisen at this plane. Had faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty not arisen at that plane? At the immaterial plane, eye faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that mind faculty had not arisen at that plane.

At that plane of non-percipient beings, neither eye faculty nor mind faculty had arisen at that plane.

Or else, mind faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had eye faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

(Based on eye faculty.)

Nose faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had femininity faculty … pe … masculinity faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, masculinity faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had nose faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

Nose faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had life faculty not arisen at that plane? Had arisen.

Or else, life faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had nose faculty not arisen at that plane? None.

Nose faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had (mental) joy faculty not arisen at that plane? At the fine-material plane, nose faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that (mental) joy faculty had not arisen at that plane. At that plane of non-percipient beings and at the immaterial plane, neither nose faculty nor (mental) joy faculty had arisen at that plane.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had nose faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

Nose faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had equanimity faculty not arisen at that plane? At the fine-material plane and at the immaterial plane, nose faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that equanimity faculty had not arisen at that plane. At that plane of non-percipient beings, neither nose faculty nor equanimity faculty had arisen at that plane.

Or else, equanimity faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had nose faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

Nose faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty not arisen at that plane? At the fine-material plane and the immaterial plane, nose faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that mind faculty had not arisen at that plane. At that plane of non-percipient beings, neither nose faculty nor mind faculty had arisen at that plane.

Or else, mind faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had nose faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

(Based on nose faculty.)

Femininity faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had masculinity faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, masculinity faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had femininity faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes. … pe …

Masculinity faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had life faculty not arisen at that plane? Had arisen.

Or else, life faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had masculinity faculty not arisen at that plane? None.

Masculinity faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had (mental) joy faculty not arisen at that plane? At the fine-material plane, masculinity faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that (mental) joy faculty had not arisen at that plane. At that plane of non-percipient beings and at the immaterial plane, neither masculinity faculty nor (mental) joy faculty had arisen at that plane.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had masculinity faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

Masculinity faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had equanimity faculty not arisen at that plane? At the fine-material plane and at the immaterial plane, masculinity faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that equanimity faculty had not arisen at that plane. At that plane of non-percipient beings, neither masculinity faculty nor equanimity faculty had arisen at that plane.

Or else, equanimity faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had masculinity faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

Masculinity faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty not arisen at that plane? At the fine-material plane and at the immaterial plane, masculinity faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that mind faculty had not arisen at that plane. At that plane of non-percipient beings, neither masculinity faculty nor mind faculty had arisen at this plane. Or else, mind faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had masculinity faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

(Based on masculinity faculty.)

Life faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had (mental) joy faculty not arisen at that plane? None.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had life faculty not arisen at that plane? Had arisen.

Life faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had equanimity faculty … pe … faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty not arisen at that plane? None.

Or else, mind faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had life faculty not arisen at that plane? Had arisen.

(Based on faith life.)

(Mental) joy faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had equanimity faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, equanimity faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had (mental) joy faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

(Mental) joy faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had (mental) joy faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

(Based on (mental) joy faculty.)

Equanimity faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had equanimity faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

(Based on equanimity faculty.)

Faith faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had faith faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

(Based on faith faculty.)

Understanding faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had mind faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty had not arisen at this plane. Had understanding faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

(Based on understanding faculty.)

Negative (Paccanīka) Person and Plane (Puggalokāsa)

Eye faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had ear faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, ear faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had eye faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Eye faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had nose faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, nose faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had eye faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? To those fine material beings, nose faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that eye faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those pure abode beings, to those non-percipient beings and to those immaterial beings, neither nose faculty nor eye faculty had arisen at that plane.

Eye faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had equanimity faculty … pe … masculinity faculty not arisen at that plane? Yes.

Or else, masculinity faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had eye faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? To those fine-material beings, masculinity faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that eye faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those pure-abode beings, to those non-percipient beings and to those immaterial beings, neither masculinity faculty nor eye faculty had arisen at that plane.

Eye faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had life faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? To those non-percipient beings and to those immaterial beings, eye faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that life faculty had arisen to those persons at that plane. To those pure-abode beings, neither eye faculty nor life faculty had arisen at that plane.

Or else, life faculty ha not arisen to this person at this plane. Had eye faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Eye faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had equanimity faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? To those immaterial beings, eye faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that equanimity faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those pure-abode beings and to those non-percipient beings, neither eye faculty nor equanimity faculty had arisen at that plane.

Or else, equanimity faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had eye faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Eye faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? To those immaterial beings, eye faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that mind faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those pure-abode beings and to those non-percipient beings, neither eye faculty nor mind faculty had arisen at that plane.

Or else, mind faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had eye faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

(Based on eye faculty.)

Nose faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had femininity faculty … pe … masculinity faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, masculinity faculty had arisen to this person at this plane. Had nose faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes. To those fine-material beings and to those immaterial beings, nose faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that life faculty had not arisen to those person at that plane. To those pure-abode beings, neither nose faculty nor life faculty had arisen at that plane? Or else, life faculty had not arisen to this person, at this plane. Had nose faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Nose faculty had not arisen to this person this plane. Had (mental) joy faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? To those fine-material beings, nose faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that (mental) joy faculty had not arisen to those person at that plane. To those pure-abode beings, to those non-percipient beings and to those immaterial beings, neither nose faculty nor (mental) joy faculty had arisen at that plane.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had nose faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Nose faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had equanimity faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? To those fine-material beings and to those material beings, nose faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that equanimity faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those pure-abode beings and to those non-percipient beings, neither nose faculty nor equanimity faculty had arisen at that plane.

Or else, equanimity faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had nose faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Nose faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? To those fine-material beings and to those immaterial beings, nose faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that mind faculty had not arisen to those person at that plane. To those pure-abode beings and to those non-percipient beings, neither nose faculty nor mind faculty had arisen at that plane.

Or else, mind faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had nose faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

(Based on nose faculty.)

Femininity faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had masculinity not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, masculinity faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had femininity faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes. … pe …

Masculinity faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had life faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? To those fine-material beings and to those immaterial beings, masculinity faculty had not arisen at that plane: (it is) not that life faculty had not arisen to those at that plane. To those pure-abode beings, neither masculinity faculty nor life faculty had arisen at that plane.

Or else, life faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had masculinity faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Masculinity faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had (mental) joy not arisen to that person at that plane? To those fine-material beings, masculinity faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that (mental) joy faculty had not arisen to those person at that plane. To those pure-abode beings, to those non-percipient beings and to those immaterial, neither masculinity faculty nor (mental) joy faculty had arisen at that plane.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had masculinity faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Masculinity faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had equanimity faculty not arisen at that person at that plane? To those fine-material beings and to those immaterial beings, masculinity faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that equanimity faculty had not arisen to those person at that plane. To those pure-abode beings and to those non-percipient beings, neither masculinity faculty nor equanimity faculty had arisen at that plane.

Or else, equanimity faculty had not arise to this person at this plane. Had masculinity faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Masculinity faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? To those fine-material beings and to those immaterial beings, masculinity faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that mind faculty had not arisen to those person at that plane. To those pure-abode beings to those non-percipient beings, neither masculinity faculty nor mind faculty had arisen at that plane.

Or else, mind faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had masculinity faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

(Based on masculinity faculty.)

Life faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had (mental) joy faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had life faculty not arisen to that person at that plane To those pure-abode beings at the moment of second consciousness and to those non-percipient beings, (mental) joy faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that life faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those pure-abode beings at the nascent phase of rebirth consciousness, neither (mental) joy faculty nor life faculty had arisen at that plane.

Life faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had equanimity faculty … pe … faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had life faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? To those non-percipient beings, mind faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that life faculty had not arisen to those person at that plane. To those pure-abode beings at the nascent phase of re-birth consciousness, neither mind faculty nor life faculty had arisen at that plane.

(Based on faith life.)

(Mental) joy faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had equanimity faculty … pe … faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? To those pure-abode beings at the moments of second consciousness, (mental) joy faculty had not arisen at that plane; (it is) not that mind faculty had not arisen to those persons at that plane. To those at the birth-moment of pure-abode beings and to those non-percipient beings, neither mental-joy faculty nor mind faculty had arisen at that plane.

Or else, mind faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had (mental) joy faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

(Based on (mental) joy faculty.)

Equanimity faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had equanimity faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

(Based on equanimity faculty.)

Faith faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty had not arisen to this person at that plane? Yes.

(Based on faith faculty.)

Understanding faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had mind faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty had not arisen to this person at this plane. Had understanding faculty not arisen to that person at that plane? Yes.

(Based on understanding faculty.)

3. Chapter on the Future (Anagatavāra)

Positive (Anuloma) Person (Puggala)

Eye faculty will arise to this person. Will ear faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Or else, ear faculty will arise to this person. Will eye faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Eye faculty will arise to this person. Will nose faculty arise to that person? To those who will be born at the fine-material plane and will die finally there (without being reborn i.e. Parinibbāna), eye faculty will arise; nose faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, eye faculty will arise and nose faculty also will arise.

Or else, nose faculty will arise to this person. Will eye faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Eye faculty will arise to this person. Will femininity faculty arise to that person? To those person who will be born at the fine-material plane and will die finally there(without being reborn i.e. Parinibbāna), and to those men who will take some rebirths only at that manhood and will die finally there(without being reborn i.e. Parinibbāna), eye faculty will arise; femininity faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, eye faculty will arise and femininity faculty also will arise.

Or else, femininity faculty will arise to this person. Will eye faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Eye faculty will arise to this person. Will masculinity faculty arise to that person? To those persons who will be born at the fine-material plane and will die finally there(without being reborn i.e.

Parinibbāna) and to those women who will take some rebirths only as that womanhood and will die finally there(without being reborn i.e. Parinibbāna), eye faculty will arise; masculinity faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others eye faculty will arise and masculinity faculty also will arise.

Or else, masculinity faculty will arise to this person. Will eye faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Eye faculty will arise to this person. Will life faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Or else, life faculty will arise to this person. Will eye faculty arise to that person? To those person who will be born at the immaterial plane and will die finally there(without being reborn i.e. Parinibbāna), life faculty will arise; eye faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, life faculty will arise and eye faculty also will arise.

Eye faculty will arise to this person. Will (mental) joy faculty arise to that person? To those person who having eye will be born with equanimity and will die finally there(without being reborn i.e. Parinibbāna), eye faculty will arise; mental joy faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, eye faculty will arise and (mental) joy faculty also will arise.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty will arise to this person. Will eye faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Eye faculty will arise to this person. Will equanimity faculty arise to that person? To those person who having eye will be born with (mental) joy and will die finally there(without being reborn i.e. Parinibbāna), eye faculty will arise; equanimity faculty will not arise to those persons. To those, eye faculty will arise and equanimity faculty also will arise.

Or else, equanimity faculty will arise to this person. Will eye faculty arise to that person? To those persons who will be born at the immaterial plane and will die finally there(without being reborn i.e. Parinibbāna), equanimity faculty will arise; eye faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, equanimity faculty will arise and eye faculty also will arise.

Eye faculty will arise to this person. Will faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty will arise to this person. Will eye faculty arise to that person? To those persons who will be born at the immaterial plane and will die finally there(without being reborn i.e. Parinibbāna), mind faculty will arise

Eye faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, mind faculty will arise and eye faculty also will arise.

(Based on eye faculty.)

Nose faculty will arise to this person. Will femininity faculty arise to that person? To those men who will take some rebirths only as that manhood will die finally there(without being reborn i.e. Parinibbāna), nose faculty will arise, femininity faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, nose faculty will arise and femininity faculty also will arise.

Or else, femininity faculty will arise to this person. Will nose faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Nose faculty will arise to this person. Will masculinity faculty arise to that person? To those women who will take some rebirths only as that womanhood and will die finally there(without being reborn i.e. Parinibbāna), nose faculty will arise; masculinity faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, nose faculty will arise and masculinity faculty also will arise.

Or else, masculinity faculty will arise to this person. Will nose faculty will arise to this person? Yes.

Nose faculty will arise to this person. Will life faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Or else, life faculty will arise to this person. Will nose faculty arise to that person? To those persons who will be born at the fine-material plane and at the immaterial plane and will die finally there(without being reborn i.e. Parinibbāna), life faculty will arise; nose faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, life faculty arise and nose faculty also will arise.

Nose faculty will arise to this person. Will (mental) joy faculty arise to that person? To those persons who having nose will be born with equanimity and will die finally there(without being reborn i.e. Parinibbāna), nose faculty will arise: (mental) joy faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others nose faculty will arise (mental) joy faculty also will arise.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty will arise to this person. Will nose faculty arise to that person? To those persons who will be born at the fine-material plane and will die finally there(without being reborn i.e. Parinibbāna), (mental) joy faculty will arise; nose faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, (mental) joy faculty will arise and nose faculty also will arise.

Nose faculty will arise to this person. Will equanimity faculty arise to that person? To those persons who having nose will be born with (mental) joy and will die finally there(without being reborn i.e. Parinibbāna), nose faculty will arise; equanimity faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, nose faculty will arise and equanimity faculty also will arise.

Or else, equanimity faculty will arise to this person. Will nose faculty arise to that person? To those persons who will be born at the fine-material plane and will die finally there(without being reborn i.e. Parinibbāna), (mental) joy faculty will arise; nose faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, (mental) joy faculty will arise and nose faculty also will arise.

Nose faculty will arise to this person. Will equanimity faculty arise to that person? To those persons who having nose will be born with (mental) joy and will die finally there(without being reborn i.e. Parinibbāna), nose faculty will arise; equanimity faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, nose faculty will arise and equanimity faculty also will arise.

Or else, equanimity faculty will arise to this person. Will nose faculty arise to that person? To those persons who will be born at the fine-material plane and at the immaterial plane and will die finally there(without being reborn i.e. Parinibbāna), equanimity faculty will arise; nose faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, equanimity faculty will arise and nose faculty also will arise.

Nose faculty will arise to this person. Will faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty will arise to this person. Will nose faculty arise to that person? To those persons who will be born at the fine-material plane and at the immaterial plane and will die finally there (without being reborn i.e. Parinibbāna), mind faculty will arise; nose faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, mind faculty will arise and nose faculty also will arise.

(Based on nose faculty.)

Femininity faculty will arise to this person will masculinity faculty arise to that person? To those women who will take some rebirths only as that womanhood and will die finally there, femininity faculty will arise; masculinity will not arise to those persons. To those others, femininity faculty will arise and masculinity faculty also will arise.

Or else, masculinity faculty will arise to this person. Will femininity faculty arise to that person? To those men who will take some rebirths only as that manhood and will die finally there, masculinity faculty will arise; femininity faculty will not arise to this persons. To those others, masculinity faculty will arise and femininity faculty also will arise.

Femininity faculty will arise to this person. Will life faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Or else, life faculty will arise to this person. Will femininity faculty arise to that person? To those who will be born at the fine-material plane and the immaterial plane and will die finally faculty will arise; femininity others, life faculty will arise and femininity faculty also will arise.

Femininity faculty will arise to this person. Will (mental) joy faculty arise to that person? To those women who will take some rebirths only as that womanhood and will be born with equanimity and will die finally there, femininity faculty will arise; (mental) joy faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, femininity faculty will arise and (mental) joy faculty will also arise.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty will arise to that person. Will femininity faculty arise to that person? To those who will be born at the fine-material plane and will die finally there and to those men who will take some rebirths only as that manhood and will be born with (mental) joy and will die finally there, (mental) joy faculty will arise

; femininity faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, (mental) joy faculty will arise and femininity faculty also will arise.

Femininity faculty will arise to this person. Will equanimity faculty arise to that person? To those who women will take some rebirths only as that womanhood and will be born with (mental) joy and will be born with (mental) joy and will die finally there, femininity faculty will arise; equanimity faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, femininity faculty will arise and equanimity faculty also will arise.

Or else, equanimity faculty will not arise to this person. Will femininity faculty arise to that person? To those who will be born at the fine-material plane and at the immaterial plane and will die finally there and to those men who will take some rebirths only as that manhood and will be born with equanimity and will die finally there, equanimity faculty will arise; femininity faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, equanimity faculty will arise and femininity faculty will also arise.

Femininity faculty will arise to this person. Will faith faculty:p: understanding faculty:p: mind faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty will arise to this person. Will femininity faculty arise to this person? To those who will be born at the fine-material plane and at the immaterial plane and will die finally there and to those men who will take some rebirths only as that manhood and will die finally there, mind faculty will arise; femininity faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, mind faculty will arise and femininity faculty also will arise.

(Based on femininity faculty.)

Masculinity faculty will arise to this person. Will faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Or else, life faculty will arise to this person. Will masculinity faculty arise to that person? To those who will be born at the fine-material plane and at the immaterial plane and will die finally there and to those women who will take some births only as that womanhood and will die finally there, life faculty will arise; masculinity faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, life faculty will arise and masculinity also will arise.

Masculinity faculty will arise to this person. Will (mental) joy faculty arise to that person? To those men who will take some rebirths only as that manhood and will be born with equanimity and will die finally there, masculinity faculty will arise; (mental) joy faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, masculinity faculty will arise and (mental) joy faculty also will arise.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty will arise to this person. Will masculinity faculty arise to that person? To those who will be born at the fine-material plane and will die finally there and to those women who will take some rebirths only as that womanhood and will be born with (mental) joy and will die finally there, (mental) joy faculty will arise; To those others, (mental) joy faculty will arise and masculinity faculty also will arise.

Masculinity faculty will arise to this person. Will equanimity faculty arise to that person? To those men who will take some rebirths only as that manhood and will be born with (mental) joy and will die finally there, masculinity faculty will arise; equanimity faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, masculinity faculty will arise and equanimity faculty also will arise.

Or else, equanimity faculty will arise to this person. Will masculinity faculty arise to that person? To those who will be born at the fine-material plane and at the immaterial plane and will die finally there and to those women who will take some rebirths only as that womanhood and will be born with equanimity and will die finally there, equanimity faculty will arise; masculinity faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others equanimity faculty will arise and masculinity faculty also will arise.

Masculinity faculty will arise to this person. Will faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty will arise to this person. Will masculinity faculty arise to that person? To those who will be born at the fine-material plane and the immaterial plane and will die finally there, and to those women who will take some rebirths only as that womanhood and will die finally there, mind faculty will arise; masculinity faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, mind faculty will arise and masculinity faculty also will arise.

(Based on masculinity faculty.)

Life faculty will arise to this person. Will (mental) joy faculty arise to that person? To those whose final consciousness associated with equanimity will arise after this consciousness, life faculty will arise; (mental) joy faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, life faculty will arise and (mental) joy faculty also will arise.

Or else, (mental) joy faculty will arise to this person. Will life faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Life faculty will arise to this person. Will equanimity faculty arise to that person? To those whose final consciousness associated with (mental) joy will arise after this consciousness, life faculty will arise; equanimity faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, life faculty will arise and equanimity faculty also will arise.

Or else, equanimity faculty will arise to this person. Will life faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Life faculty will arise to this person. Will faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty arise to this person. Will life faculty arise to that person? Yes.

(Based on faith life.)

(Mental) joy faculty will arise to this person. Will equanimity faculty arise to that person? To those whose final consciousness associated with (mental) joy will arise after this consciousness, (mental) joy faculty will arise; equanimity faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, (mental) joy faculty will arise and equanimity faculty also will arise.

Or else, equanimity faculty will arise to this person. Will (mental) joy faculty arise to that person? To those whose final consciousness associated with equanimity will arise after this consciousness, equanimity faculty will arise; (mental) joy faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, equanimity faculty will arise and (mental) joy faculty also will arise.

(Mental) joy faculty will arise to this person. Will faith faculty … pe … understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty will arise to this person. Will (mental) joy faculty arise to that person? To those whose final consciousness associated with equanimity will arise after this consciousness, mind faculty will arise; (mental) joy faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, mind faculty will arise and (mental) joy faculty also will arise.

(Based on (mental) joy faculty.)

Equanimity faculty will arise to this person. Will faith faculty:p: understanding faculty;p: mind faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty will arise to this person. Will equanimity faculty arise to that person? To those whose final consciousness associated with mental joy will arise after this consciousness, mind faculty will arise; equanimity faculty will not arise to those persons. To those others, mind faculty will arise and equanimity faculty also will arise.

(Based on equanimity faculty.)

Faith faculty will arise to this person. Will understanding faculty … pe … mind faculty to that person? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty will arise to this person. Will faith faculty arise to that person? Yes.

(Based on faith faculty.)

Understanding faculty will arise to this person. Will mind faculty arise to that person? Yes.

Or else, mind faculty will arise to this person. Will understanding faculty arise to that person? Yes.

(Based on understanding faculty.)

Nguồn: Bản tiếng Anh từ SuttaCentral, nhiều dịch giả (tên dịch giả ghi ở từng bài). Nguyên bản Pāli và bản dịch trên Bilara: CC0 1.0. Các bản dịch khác: dùng theo sự đồng ý của SuttaCentral và các bên giữ bản quyền.